As the pressure to take the experimental COVID vaccine intensifies, many people are being forced to make extremely difficult decisions that may greatly impact their livelihoods and even their lives. Unfortunately, there are too many people who still rely on the corporate-owned and controlled media to give them the truth about this issue. That is a big mistake.
It’s not just the corporate media either. Our health agencies and entire medical system have been captured by powerful pharmaceutical corporations with blatant conflicts of interest that cannot be ignored. Just about every mainstream source of information is purposely ignoring and censoring stories that are not aligned with the official narrative.
In this article, we would like to highlight some of the legitimate concerns people have about this “vaccine” that are being downplayed, ignored, or outright censored by the media and our health officials. This article is by no means all the information there is about these vaccines but can serve as a jumping-off point for those looking to find out information the corporate media is refusing to report or acknowledge.
1) Risk vs Reward
Despite what the corporate media, politicians, and world health officials want you to believe, for the majority of the population, this virus is not a mortal threat. In fact, the survival rate for COVID is over 99% for most people. Contracting Covid is not a pleasant experience and it affects different people in different ways, but for the majority of the population, these are temporary symptoms. Many people would rather take their chances with COVID than try a fast-tracked, experimental, emergency-use authorized vaccine that has the potential for life-altering side effects. No amount of free Krispy Kreme donuts or whatever else the states are offering will make these people gamble with their health or the health of their loved ones.
2) Too Many Unknowns
We are told by health officials, politicians, and the media that these experimental shots are safe and effective. The truth is, this mass vaccination campaign is the world’s largest medical experiment ever conducted. This is a fact! These vaccines were fast-tracked, which means limited safety & efficacy trials, which also means, we are the test subjects.
Vaccines or any medical product typically take many years to come to market and just because the FDA recently approved a version of this new vaccine does not mean that they are safe. In fact, the FDA approved many new drugs that were later recalled for safety reasons, and tens of thousands of people were permanently damaged in the process. How can the FDA possibly know the long-term effects of such a new medical treatment??
The truth is, it is impossible for anyone to know how this fast-tracked medical experiment will affect long-term health! It has not been in use long enough! It is not hyperbole to say that we are being used as human guinea pigs or lab rats. Some vaccine manufacturers even admit this is a big experiment.
3) These Are Not Vaccines & They Do Not Stop Infection Or The Spread Of New Cases
This is not a vaccine, so let’s start calling it what it really is, a new experimental medical treatment. A vaccine is designed to prevent infection and stop the transmission of new cases (even though shedding has often been an issue with previous vaccines). These “vaccines” do neither. This new experimental medical treatment is very different from traditional vaccines in many other ways too.
Aside from the fact that these new “vaccines” were created at “Warp Speed” forgoing typical vaccine safety tests, an equally troubling aspect of them may be that they are introducing new technologies and genetically modified organisms into the human body. This has never been done in previous vaccines. Well-known vaccine investor, Bill Gates even admits that they will be “injecting genetically modified organisms into little kids’ arms” in this video that Youtube banned.
Independent researchers are finding that there are other additional very troubling ingredients in these new “vaccines” that have never been used before. More on that later in the article. These are some of the reasons that they cannot be properly categorized as a vaccine. My guess is that they are using this term because people are familiar with it, but don’t be fooled, they are most certainly not vaccines, at least not in the traditional sense. A better way to describe these vaccines would be to call them gene therapy because they operate using gene therapy technology.
This experimental medical treatment is only presumed to lessen the severity of Covid symptoms and minimize hospitalizations. What’s more, any presumed health benefits from this treatment are short-lived as proven by the endless booster shots we are now being told we need. An ex Pfizer employee, Karen Kingston recently stated and provided documents showing that the people who were vaccinated were up to 300% more susceptible to contracting COVID.
So we need to ask ourselves an important question: if this experimental medical treatment does not prevent variations of COVID (breakthrough cases) or stop the spread of new cases, why does it need to be mandated? What is the difference between a vaccinated person and an unvaccinated person in regards to posing a public health risk? And what is the real risk to the public? Remember, this virus has a 99% survival rate for the majority of the population! If people choose to take this treatment, that’s fine, but mandating this “vaccine” makes absolutely no sense!
4) Highly Credible Medical Experts Are Warning Us Not To Take This New Vaccine
Dr. Peter McCullough is a world-renowned epidemiologist, cardiologist, and professor at Texas A&M College of Medicine. In the video above, Dr. Mc Cullough explains why people should not take this vaccine. Dr. McCullough has been practicing medicine for over 40 years and his credentials are impeccable:
Dr. Peter McCullough, MD, MPH, FACC, FACP, FAHA, FASN, FNKF, FNLA, FCRSA
Professor of Medicine, Texas A & M College of Medicine, Baylor Dallas Campus
President, Cardiorenal Society of America
Editor-in-Chief, Cardiorenal Medicine
Editor-in-Chief, Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
Senior Associate Editor, American Journal of Cardiology
Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor/pioneer of the mRNA vaccine went on the record urging the halt of COVID Vaccines, especially with young people. Former Pfizer Vice President, Dr. Michael Yeadon is also warning people not to take this vaccine. These are pro-vaccine doctors telling us not to take this new vaccine. Shouldn’t we be concerned about their warnings?
Did you know that over 7,000 doctors and scientists have signed the “Rome Declaration” accusing COVID policy-makers of ‘Crimes Against Humanity’? There are also dozens of other credible medical experts who are not beholden to the pharmaceutical industry coming out against these experimental medical treatments and they’re doing so at great risk to their careers and reputations.
5) People Are Personally Witnessing The Effects of This Experimental “Vaccine” on Their Friends, Family, and Loved Ones
Israel is one of the most vaccinated countries in the world, yet they have one of the highest mortality rates attributed to COVID. What’s interesting is Israel’s COVID mortality rate skyrocketed after the experimental Pfizer vaccine was introduced. In the video above, we hear first-hand accounts of vaccine damage from Israeli citizens known as The Testimonies Project. The Testimonies Project was started because the Israeli media refused to report on these adverse events.
WXYZ Detroit Local Channel 7 News published a Facebook post several weeks ago asking their readers to share stories about losing unvaccinated loved ones to Covid. Much to their surprise, I’m sure, the comment section was inundated with first-hand accounts of vaccine injuries and deaths. The post received over 240 thousand comments and over 200,000 shares.
I spent hours on end reading thousands of comments and 99.9% of the stories that I read were about vaccinated people being moderately to severely injured or killed from the vaccine. The screenshot above is only a few of the most popular comments but there are thousands of more comments just like them. It was truly stunning to see how many lives are being destroyed by this experimental shot.
As more people receive this experimental shot, we are witnessing its destructive aftermath, and despite the media’s censorship campaign, people are talking about their experiences. Would you be hesitant to take this experimental shot if your family member or loved one was permanently disabled or died after the shot?
6) COVID Vaccine Side Effects Are NOT RARE
We are constantly being told that these vaccines are safe and any adverse events are either unrelated or extremely rare. As we can see from the previous reason we just listed, (#5) adverse reactions are happening to tens of thousands of people. In the video linked above, you can see how horrific some of these adverse reactions can be. By the way, there are countless more videos like the one linked above on free speech video sites like Bitchute, but you will find very few if any YouTube. More on that later.
As of the publishing of this article, using data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) there have been over 700,000 adverse events recorded with over 15,000 deaths in the U.S. alone from this fast-tracked experimental medical treatment. In other parts of the world, these figures are even higher. To put this in perspective, in the 1970s, the swine flu vaccine killed less than 100 people, and the program was immediately discontinued. In this case, however, our health officials are ignoring this data and/or making excuses regarding the accuracy of the VAERS database. To make matters worse, Harvard University conducted a study that revealed fewer than 1% of adverse reactions are reported to VAERS. The CDC silenced the Harvard Project and many try to debunk this study but that is just par for the course when it comes to vaccine damage.
Did you know that the CDC does not count any injuries or deaths from the COVID vaccine until after 14 days have passed? If someone dies within the 14 day period they are counted as unvaccinated. Not only does this inaccurately inflate the unvaccinated death toll, but it also hides the real dangers of the COVID shots, as the vast majority of deaths from these shots occur within the first two weeks.
7) Important Information is Being Censored
Have you ever noticed that you will rarely see any meaningful stories about vaccine injuries or deaths in the corporate media? Keep in mind, pharmaceutical companies are some of the corporate media’s biggest sponsors.
If you’re looking for information on vaccine damages, don’t bother trying to find them on major platforms. Youtube just removed 130,000 videos and banned all content that questions the official vaccine narrative. Google/Youtube scrubs all information about vaccine damages yet you can find them daily on free speech video sites like Bitchute, Gab, and Rumble.
Some search engines are better than others but for the most part, they are all censoring content these days. It seems like any information that does not support the official narrative is being vigorously censored. Here are some stories that you will not find that easily:
Did you know that a group of independent German doctors and lawyers examined the blood of the vaccinated patients in their practice and found that the blood platelets in the people after vaccination were all clumping together making blood flow difficult to circulate in small capillaries of the body? Is this why so many people are getting blood clots and strokes? They also found strange metallic strands that were as they put it, “very troubling & unexplainable.”
A Canadian researcher who gained access to Pfizers biodistribution study supported the German’s findings and reported the spike proteins are causing the blood platelets to clump together. He is just one of many researchers and doctors that are critical of the spike protein’s role in these vaccines. Here is an excerpt from the article:
- Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher Byram Bridle, Ph.D., has gained access to Pfizer’s biodistribution study from the Japanese regulatory agency. The research, previously unseen, demonstrates a huge problem with all COVID-19 vaccines
- The assumption that vaccine developers have been working with is that the mRNA in the vaccines would primarily remain in and around the vaccination site. Pfizer’s data, however, show the mRNA and subsequent spike protein are widely distributed in the body within hours
- This is a serious problem, as the spike protein is a toxin shown to cause cardiovascular and neurological damage. It also has reproductive toxicity, and Pfizer’s biodistribution data show it accumulates in women’s ovaries
- Once in your blood circulation, the spike protein binds to platelet receptors and the cells that line your blood vessels. When that happens, it can cause platelets to clump together, resulting in blood clots, and/or cause abnormal bleeding
- Pfizer documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency also show the company failed to follow industry-standard quality management practices during preclinical toxicology studies and that key studies did not meet good laboratory practice standards
Did you know that an independent Spanish laboratory, La Quinta Columna, examined unused vials of vaccines and found the well-known toxic substance Graphene Oxide? The media tried to debunk this but Dr. Robert Young did a comprehensive analysis of all four COVID vaccines on the market and confirmed the same findings. Ex Pfizer employee turned whistleblower, Karen Kingston also confirmed graphene oxide through her research which she explains in this video. The one thing that all of the researchers strongly agreed upon was that there is no possible reason for a known toxic substance like graphene oxide to ever be injected into a human.
The COVID Cult: If you even question the safety or efficacy of these vaccines you are immediately attacked and labeled an anti-vaxxer or conspiracy theorist. Look at what happened to Nicki Minaj for merely suggesting to her social media followers to do some research before taking the shot. I’m the furthest thing from a Nicki Minaj fan and I don’t think anyone should take any advice from celebrities, most of them are just corporate spokespeople. That’s not the point. The point is that Nicki Manaj just said to do some research before taking the shot.
Don’t we all do research to some degree on any important products we wish to buy? Why are we not allowed to do research on these experimental vaccines? At the end of the day, these vaccines are products made by corporations. They are not infallible. Not only are they not infallible, but pharmaceutical companies also have a long and sordid history of lying and deceiving the public.
We are constantly told that we need to “follow the science.” The whole essence of scientific research is to constantly question and challenge previously held conclusions. Yet we can’t ask questions when it comes to the COVID “vaccines.” This COVID cult vaccine narrative has far more in common with religion than science. This is a huge red flag and leading more and more people to distrust the narrative.
8) Naturally Acquired Antibodies Being Ignored
In the video above, Dr. Rand Paul does an excellent job pointing out to HHS Sec. Xavier Becerra the fact that millions of people have already contracted Covid and have naturally developed antibodies to the virus that new studies show are far more effective against COVID than vaccines. Pfizer’s own scientists admit that natural immunity makes the vaccine unnecessary but they say that they are not allowed to talk about it because it goes against Pfizer’s business model. As far as the policymakers behind this experimental mass vaccination campaign are concerned, the vaccine is a hammer and everyone is a nail, no matter what preexisting conditions or special circumstances people may have. As Dr. Paul correctly points out in the video above, our health officials say they are following science when they are actually ignoring science.
9) Alternative Treatments For COVID Are Being Suppressed
There are several other ways to treat Covid which have shown great success, despite what the promoters of this vaccine tell us. We reported on Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as early as May of 2020. At that point, Dr. Zelenko from New York had successfully treated over 500 of his patients with his HCQ protocol. To date, Dr. Zelenko has successfully treated over 7000 people with his HCQ protocol.
The corporate media and our health officials did everything they could to try and falsely discredit and suppress this successful treatment, even though Dr. Fauci knew HCQ was a viable treatment by his own institution’s testing back in 2005. In fact, the Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine had to retract their false studies finding HCQ deadly and ineffective. Unfortunately, people only hear about or remember the first story falsely attacking this alternative treatment, not the retractions.
Did you know that in India the use of Ivermectin nearly wiped out the COVID Delta variant in a large portion of their population by 97%? What this showed was Ivermectin was far more effective than vaccines but of course, this news and the relating studies were essentially blacked out because information like this does not support the “vaccinate everyone narrative.”
Why is there a coordinated effort to suppress and restrict these alternative treatments and demonize anyone who uses them? Shouldn’t we be trying every possible way to treat people, especially when people are finding success? Why is this experimental vaccine the only way? Maybe because they would not be able to mandate the COVID vaccines if there were other viable treatments available.
What this behavior clearly shows is that our politicians and health officials are not interested in saving lives, only limiting our choices and increasing vaccine uptake. This does not instill trust in the people promoting the COVID vaccines and is another huge red flag for those who are paying attention.
10) Many People Who Took The First Round Of Shots Are Done
This is anecdotal but our team has read thousands of comments on social media posts made by people who already took the first round of shots and are refusing to take anymore. I have also personally spoken with people who say that they will not take any more shots after their first round. One of my good friends had a severe stroke a few days after taking the shot in which he is still recovering from and he has stated under no circumstances will take it again. Can you blame him?
There are a lot of reasons why these early adopters of the experimental vaccines are no longer okay with this. Many of them had bad experiences with the first round and for many people, it came down to this; they did not sign up for a lifetime of experimental vaccines that require additional boosters shots every six months. Keep in mind, with this new vaccine normal, you’re vaccinations status is only as good as your last shot. This is for a virus that has over a 99% recovery rate for most people.
As more information comes out about this experimental “vaccine” we are learning that it is not some magic bullet. For many, this experimental shot is more like a bullet to the head. We now have overwhelming evidence and testimony that this vaccine is most certainly altering thousands of lives in profound ways. We’ve listed 10 legitimate reasons people are not taking this shot(s) but even just a few of the reasons we listed is enough to make anyone hesitant to take the shot(s).
Contrary to popular belief, there is no empirical evidence that suggests the unvaccinated are more of a danger to society than the vaccinated, only politicized propaganda designed to shame people into taking the shot and to pit them against those who were vaccinated. New studies are showing that the viral loads of vaccine breakthrough cases are akin to those of the unvaccinated.
As we mentioned earlier, if these experimental vaccines do not prevent someone from getting COVID or the spread of new cases, what is the difference between a vaccinated and an unvaccinated person in regards to being a public health risk? If the “vaccine” can only lessen someone’s symptoms and not stop the spread of COVID, why are we mandating them? For a virus with a 99% survival rate for the majority of the population!
Did you know that the whole basis of testing people for COVID during this pandemic is flawed and our health agencies know it? Did you know that Kary Mullis, Nobel Prize winner and the inventor of the PCR test stated that the PCR test should never be used to diagnose people because it will yield a high rate of false positives?
The truth is that this whole pandemic has been sensationalized, politicized, and weaponized from day one. The lies and contradictions from our so-called leaders over the last 18 months are too numerous to list. Covid cases and deaths have been artificially inflated to make this crisis seem worse than it really is – all to scare people into accepting lockdowns and taking these experimental vaccines.
I’m not suggesting that COVID is not a real threat or that it’s not dangerous to a small portion of our population. I’m not arguing that people should not take the vaccine if they want to either. What I am saying emphatically is that there is most certainly a larger agenda at play here and to force this experimental medical treatment on the world for a virus with such a low casualty rate is absolutely absurd!
If we are not free to choose what goes into or is done to our bodies, we are not free people.
The good news is that this planned-demic or scamdemic has been very instrumental in showing the world just how corrupt our leaders and institutions are. People are starting to see through the false narrative and how it’s being used to push a larger agenda. The enemies of humanity are being exposed on a grand scale.
I have a feeling when the dust settles, history will not be kind to the people mandating these experimental mass vaccinations as well as the people who are shunning & segregating the unvaccinated.
Speed the Shift is an independent group of researchers on a mission to find the truth about controversial topics. We utilize alternative information sources that are often ignored by traditional media in an effort to gain a broader awareness of relevant issues.